

| Standardisation |
| Reliability |
| Criterion Validity |
| Construct Validities |
| 16PF & MBTI |
| OPQ & JTI |
| EPQR & Klines PPQ |
| NEO & Gordons |
| OIP & OPP |
| FIRO B |
| Scales |
| Acrobat Files |
| Right click and select 'save target as' to save to your computer |
| A sample report |
| 15FQ+ manual |
Criterion-related validity demonstrates that an assessment is useful in predicting a real-world outcome, such as performance. The following details studies where the 15FQ™ has been able to predict such outcomes.
Predicting Effective Performance in Retail Management
A major UK based electrical goods wholesaler administered 15FQ™ to a randomly selected sample of 39 branch managers whose performance was rated by District Managers. The performance rating was made independently without reference to assessment data on a simple four point scale as follows:
|
Exceptional: Fully able to plan, co-ordinate and control resources to maximum effect. Good: Fully able to plan, co-ordinate and control resources to good effect. Acceptable: Able to plan co-ordinate and control resources to a satisfactory level. Poor:Unable to plan, co-ordinate and control resources to a satisfactory level. |
Four 15FQ™ dimensions were found to have a relationship with the performance measure. The results suggested that those managers who were rated as more effective tended to be more practical, realistic, self-sufficient and emotionally resilient. A multiple regression analysis was undertaken to determine the overall relationship between the four measures and job performance. The findings suggested that the three of the four 15FQ™ measures above were able to account statistically for about 20% of performance determinants. The table below provides the summary findings.
15FQ™ Predictors of Retail Management Performance
|
Multiple Regression results: R=0.54 R2=.29 R2Adj=0.23 F(3,35)=4.75 p=0.007 | ||
| 15FQ Predictors | Beta Weight | >p-level |
| Calm-Stable vs. Emotional | 0.32 | 0.03 |
| Factual-Realistic vs. Intuitive | -0.39 | 0.01 |
| Self-sufficient vs. Group-dependent | 0.33 | 0.03 |
Prediction of Job Performance ratings for Trainee Solicitors.
A sample of 30 trainee solicitors were assessed by their direct managers at the end of the first year. Each was rated on a five point scale (5 = excellent, 1 = poor). The Following correlations were observed:
15FQ™ Correlations with Performance Ratings of Trainee Solicitors
|
15FQ™ Predictor |
Correlation Coefficient |
|
| FA | Retiring vs. Outgoing | .31 |
| FC | Emotional vs. Calm-Stable | .41 |
| FE | Accommodating vs. Assertive | .31 |
| FH | Reserved vs. Socially Bold | .40 |
| FO | Confident vs. Self-doubting | -.51 |
| FQ4 | Relaxed vs. Tense-driven | -.35 |
| Psytech International The Grange Pulloxhill Bedfordshire MK45 5HE |
| tel. 01525 720003 fax. 01525 720004 |